Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859326›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

A Direct Observation of Infanticide by a Female Free-Ranging Dog (

Melissa Vanderheyden, Brenda Chaignon, Clément Car, Małgorzata Pilot, Ikhlass El Berbri, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Friederike Range, Andreas Berghänel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa VanderheydenZoology and Animal Ecology Research Group, Department of Biology University of Hildesheim Hildesheim Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0733-4141
Brenda ChaignonDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4098-8177
Clément CarFaculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk Gdańsk Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2729-2950
Małgorzata PilotFaculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk Gdańsk Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6057-5768
Ikhlass El BerbriDepartment of Pathology and Veterinary Public Health Agronomic and Veterinary Institute Hassan II Rabat Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-6861
Sarah Marshall-PesciniDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-4701
Friederike RangeDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5536
Andreas BerghänelZoology and Animal Ecology Research Group, Department of Biology University of Hildesheim Hildesheim Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-3392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infanticide by females occurs in many mammalian species but is rarely observed directly, making its social and ecological determinants difficult to identify. Here, we report the first direct observation of within-pack infanticide by a female free-ranging domestic dog. To assess whether this case can be better explained by resource competition or nutritional gain, we examined the social context in which it occurred. In our long-term study population, we identified 26 cases characterised by a similar pattern of overlapping pregnancies within social groups. By comparing dominance rank and birth order across cases, we found that subordinate females time their births after or in synchrony with the alpha female, which may be a strategy to reduce infanticide risk. By giving birth later, the subordinate potentially allows the alpha a competitive advantage, thereby reducing the incentive for infanticide. Furthermore, subordinate free-ranging dogs may use communal denning as a protective measure, as it hinders the identification of individual litters. In our study, the infanticide followed a period of rank instability. Social rank instability could elevate infanticide risk, since the absence of dominance signals might complicate the subordinate's assessment of the potential threat to its offspring, or because infanticide is used to consolidate dominance. On the other hand, we did not find support for the hypothesis that insufficient nutrition motivated the infanticide, based on an evaluation of the body condition scores within the pack and on the observation that not all killed pups were eaten. Taken together, our preliminary findings suggest that resource competition rather than nutritional gain may better explain infanticide by female free-ranging dogs.

Indexed as

Canidaecommunal breedingreproductive conflictreproductive suppressionreproductive synchronythreat of infanticide

Identifiers

PMID41859326
PMCPMC12998265

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.