ArticleBrain & spine2026
A 3D-printed hybrid vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty and screw augmentation teaching model simulating high and low bone mineral densities.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vertebral fractures are highly prevalent, particularly among the elderly and patients with osteoporosis. Current surgical training for vertebral augmentation procedures is largely confined to the operating room, where opportunities are inherently limited in both duration and scope. Research question: To develop a realistic, accessible, and cost-efficient hybrid training model for fluoroscopy-guided vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and pedicle screw augmentation, replicating both high- and low-density vertebral bone. Material and methods: Additive manufacturing techniques were applied to reproduce vertebral morphology, bone matrix characteristics, and radiopacity corresponding to varying bone mineral densities. Fluoroscopic guidance and subsequent CT imaging were used to evaluate cement distribution and procedural realism. A structured user assessment was conducted to rate anatomical accuracy, tactile feedback, and educational value. Results: Two printing protocols were optimized to closely replicate the radiographic and haptic properties of vertebrae with high and low bone density. CT imaging confirmed realistic cement dispersion within the printed vertebral structures. User evaluations rated the model as excellent for anatomical accuracy and educational value, and very good for tactile realism. Discussion and conclusion: This 3D-printed hybrid model provides a cost-effective and reproducible platform that closely simulates both the technical and radiographic aspects of vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and pedicle screw augmentation. This novel tool offers advanced training opportunities and enhances the comprehension of intraoperative spinal anatomy at a fraction of the cost of commercially available kits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.