Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

A retrospective evaluation of an online group ketogenic metabolic therapy intervention on mental health outcomes.

Erin L Bellamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erin L BellamySchool of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conventional treatments for depression and anxiety, including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, often fail to achieve long-term symptom remission and are associated with side effects, limited accessibility, and high attrition. Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) has emerged as a potential adjunctive intervention, with studies showing improvements in metabolic and mental health outcomes. However, research on remotely delivered, group-based KMT remains limited. This study evaluates the feasibility of an online, group-based KMT program integrating psychoeducation, professional guidance, and community support on symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with varying mental health conditions. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 19 self-referred participants with baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores > 4. Participants followed a ketogenic diet tailored to individual macronutrient targets. Depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) were assessed at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: Mean PHQ-9 scores decreased from 13 to 5 over 12 weeks, representing a 62% reduction, with 71% achieving clinically meaningful improvement. Mean GAD-7 scores decreased from 13 to 7, a 46% reduction, with 79% achieving clinically meaningful improvement. Eight participants reached remission for depression and nine for anxiety. Participants achieved blood ketone levels > 0.5 mmol/L 85% of the time, indicating high adherence with mean ketone levels of 1.1 mmol/L. No serious adverse events were reported, and all participants completed the intervention. Conclusion: This remotely delivered, group-based KMT appears feasible and was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in depression and anxiety over 12 weeks. These findings support the potential of KMT as a scalable, transdiagnostic approach to conventional psychiatric care. Future research should evaluate larger samples and longer-term outcomes.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionketogenic dietketogenic metabolic therapymetabolic psychiatryonline program

Identifiers

PMID41859670
PMCPMC12996183

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.