ArticleObesity pillars2026
Joint TOS/OMA/OAC expert guidance statement on the pharmacological management of United States adults with overweight or obesity using the GRADE approach.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obesity affects over 40% of US adults, with severe obesity on the rise. Despite recognition of obesity as a chronic disease, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Access to evidence-based obesity treatment is limited, leading to increased obesity severity and related complications. Barriers to obesity treatment include socioeconomic disparities, limited clinician training, stigma, and restrictive or absent reimbursement policies. FDA-approved obesity medications offer significant health benefits, prompting the need for updated, evidence-based guidance. Methods: The Obesity Society (TOS), the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and the Obesity Action Coalition (OAC) convened a multidisciplinary panel, including patient representatives and obesity care providers, to develop a guidance statement using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Systematic evidence synthesis was conducted via Epistemonikos databases, with outcomes prioritized for clinical relevance, including weight reduction, quality of life, adverse events, and improvements in obesity complications. Recommendations were developed through consensus workshops and graded as strong or conditional based on evidence certainty, benefits, harms, equity, and feasibility using the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework. Results: The panel issued recommendations on FDA-approved obesity medications including orlistat, bupropion-naltrexone, phentermine, phentermine-topiramate, liraglutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide, and setmelanotide. Strong recommendations were made for bupropion-naltrexone, semaglutide, tirzepatide, and setmelanotide, with moderate-certainty evidence. Conditional recommendations were made for other agents and specific obesity complications (obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, osteoarthritis, major adverse cardiovascular events, and type 2 diabetes). Continuing obesity medications during weight maintenance received a strong recommendation. Conclusion: Obesity is a chronic, often progressive, disease requiring comprehensive, long-term, and person-centered care. Effective obesity medications exist but remain underutilized due to systemic barriers. Expanding access, reducing stigma, and ensuring equitable coverage are essential to translating scientific advances into population health gains. Future priorities include access and integration of comprehensive obesity care in the primary care setting, improving affordability, addressing research gaps, conducting head-to-head trials, and updating guidance as evidence evolves.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.