Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859876›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Patient and public involvement in randomized trials of lifestyle intervention among pregnant women with obesity: An umbrella review.

Elisabeth Garcia Vilaplana, Andrea Vigaray Galera, Carmen Amezcua-Prieto, Khalid Saeed Khan, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Begoña Martínez de Tejada, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient and public involvement in randomized trials of lifestyle intervention among pregnant women with obesity: An umbrella review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisabeth Garcia VilaplanaDepartment of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5431-1811
Andrea Vigaray GaleraFaculty of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Carmen Amezcua-PrietoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-4057
Khalid Saeed KhanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Aurora Bueno-CavanillasFaculty of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Begoña Martínez de TejadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Naomi Cano-IbáñezFaculty of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity increases the risk of obstetric and neonatal complications, and adherence to lifestyle interventions during pregnancy presents a challenge. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in trials may foster a more patient-centered approach, potentially improving compliance with intervention and follow up.

objectiveTo assess the extent of PPI in systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) focused on lifestyle interventions for pregnant women with obesity and its impact on compliance and follow-up rates of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase using terms related to "lifestyle", "obesity", and "pregnancy", along with filters for SRs and MAs. SELECTION CRITERIA: SRs of RCTs, with or without MAs, published from 2013 to 2024, focusing on lifestyle interventions for pregnant women with obesity (BMI ≥30 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters]). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: SR quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2. PPI reporting was evaluated using the GRIPP2 checklist and the ACTIVE framework. Compliance and follow-up rates were compared between RCTs with and without PPI. MAIN

resultsEleven SRs, 10 with MAs (including 94 RCTs) were included. They were of low quality in 3/11 (27%) and critically low in 8/11 (73%). No SRs reported implementing PPI. Only 6/94 (10%) RCTs reported PPI, 2/29 (7%) directly after the introduction of GRIPP2 (2018) and 4/65 (6%) indirectly before its introduction (P = 0.79). PPI occurred during RCT methodology planning in 2/6 (33%), knowledge translation in 2/6 (33%), or both in 2/6 (33%). Compared with RCTs not reporting PPI (n = 94), the median intervention compliance rate in RCTs reporting PPI (n = 6) was higher (74% versus 68%, P = 0.637), and the follow-up rate was lower (78% versus 89%, P = 0.138), but the difference was not statistically significant. These findings warrant cautious interpretation given the limited number of RCTs reporting PPI.

conclusionsPPI remains scarce in both SRs and RCTs evaluating lifestyle interventions in pregnant women with obesity. Future research should integrate and clearly report PPI to strengthen the evaluation of lifestyle interventions in this population.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationLife StyleObesityPatient ParticipationPregnancy ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPatient CompliancePregnancylifestyleobesitypatient and public involvementpregnancyumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41859876
PMCPMC13505233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.