ArticleJournal of global health2026
Levels of care for maternal and neonatal healthcare: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To meet the 2030 aims of the Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health and Sustainable Development Goals, annual rates of maternal and newborn mortality and stillbirth must decrease. The organisation of maternal and newborn health (MNH) services influences access to and quality of care. We designed this scoping review to understand how levels of MNH care are organised in different country contexts. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature published after 2009. Based on the World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-care framework, we conducted descriptive and deductive textual narrative analysis to identify the reported number of levels of MNH care stratified by country and mortality rates; describe how levels are conceptualised; and explore alignment of levels for the maternal-newborn dyad. Results: We included 162 of 3591 reports. The number of MNH facility levels of care across 56 countries ranged from two to seven. Types of identified MNH care facilities were described at varying levels. Two levels of care were reported in 5% of cases, three levels in 55%, four levels in 30%, five levels in 8%, and six and seven levels in <1% of cases. Home and community-based MNH care (non-facility) was reported in 8% of country descriptions. Countries with the lowest stillbirth, maternal, and newborn mortality rates mostly reported three or four facility levels. The criteria used to distinguish MNH levels of care as low, intermediate, and high were aligned with domains of the WHO quality-of-care framework, mostly human and physical resources. Conclusions: Levels of MNH care described in the literature were distinguished by characteristics, including provision and experience of routine and emergency care. Three or four levels of MNH facility care were most commonly reported. Linking maternal and newborn facility care to community connections is an important consideration to ensure equitable access to routine and emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.