ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Multimodality Assessment of a Culprit LAD Myocardial Bridge in a Patient With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial bridging is a congenital coronary anomaly in which a segment of an epicardial artery is tunneled within the myocardium. Although many cases remain asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant bridges may require surgical intervention. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old man with a history of an unrepaired ventricular septal defect presented with recurrent chest pain. Initial imaging identified a 4.7-cm myocardial bridge in the left anterior descending artery. Functional testing with fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and diastolic hyperemia-free ratio confirmed hemodynamic significance. Optical coherence tomography was performed to further visualize the segment. The patient underwent successful surgical unroofing, resulting in complete symptom resolution. DISCUSSION: This case highlights a multimodal intracoronary approach incorporating intracoronary anatomical and physiological testing to determine the hemodynamic significance of myocardial bridging. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Multimodal intracoronary anatomical and physiological testing is imperative for diagnosing myocardial bridges in patients presenting with undifferentiated angina, thereby influencing management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.