ArticleJAMA network open2026
Recommended Medical Investigations in Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The clinical utility of the comprehensive laboratory and medical investigations currently recommended for children with pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) remains unclear. Notably, comparisons with relevant psychiatric control patients without suspected immunologic pathogenesis are lacking. Objective: To evaluate whether currently recommended laboratory investigations differentiate children with PANS from children with idiopathic obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and/or tic disorders and whether the full set of recommended medical investigations identify underlying somatic conditions in children with PANS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study recruited children (aged 4-18 years) with PANS and children with idiopathic OCD and/or tic disorders (control group) from specialist PANS and OCD clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, between January 1, 2020, and September 19, 2023. The data analyses were performed between June 16, 2024, and August 19, 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Following published PANS guidelines, assessments included 56 laboratory variables from blood and throat cultures. Additional data from cerebrospinal fluid analysis, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalography were available for a subsample of the PANS group. Laboratory findings were compared between the PANS and control groups. Results: Among 109 participants, the PANS group included 51 children (mean [SD] age, 10.2 [3.4] years; 34 boys [66.7%], and the control group included 58 children (mean [SD] age, 13.6 [3.1] years; 29 boys [50.0%]). Nearly all participants had at least 1 abnormal laboratory finding (44 [86.3%] in the PANS group, 56 [96.6%] in the control group), with no significant between-group differences. Most participants in the PANS group had 3 or more abnormal laboratory findings, while most in the control group had 4 or more. One participant with PANS was diagnosed with celiac disease; another showed electroencephalographic signs of neuroinflammatory activity without a definite diagnosis prior to the PANS assessment. Incidental, nonactionable findings were frequent. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study of children with PANS and idiopathic OCD and/or tic disorders, abnormal laboratory findings were common in both groups and did not differ significantly. The full set of recommended medical investigations rarely identified underlying somatic conditions in children with PANS. These findings question the clinical utility of the comprehensive and costly medical investigations currently recommended for children with suspected PANS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.