Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860552›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Tobacco Smoking and Lung Cancer Risk After Negative Baseline Low-Dose Computed Tomography Findings.

Yin Liu, Xiaoli Guo, Ranran Qie, Qiong Chen, Huifang Xu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongwei Liu, Hong Wang, Ruihua Kang, Mengfei Zhao and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yin LiuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoli GuoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ranran QieDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Qiong ChenDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Huifang XuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoyang WangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongwei LiuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Hong WangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ruihua KangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Mengfei ZhaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Cheng ChengDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Liyang ZhengDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuzheng LiuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Jinyu ZhangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinying YueDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Youlin QiaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Shaokai ZhangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with tobacco smoking being the primary risk factor. However, the long-term LC risk among individuals with negative low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) findings and the role of tobacco smoking in risk stratification remain poorly understood, limiting evidence-based guidance for subsequent screening intervals. Objective: To evaluate the association of tobacco smoking with long-term LC risk after a negative baseline LDCT finding and to inform optimized screening strategies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, prospective cohort study was conducted under the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China. Individuals aged 40 to 74 years with negative baseline LDCT findings (October 1, 2013, to December 31, 2021) were included, with follow-up until December 2023. All participants were monitored for LC incidence. Exposures: Self-reported smoking status, pack-years, and time since quitting. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was LC incidence, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. The association between smoking exposure and LC risk was assessed, with time-stratified analyses and dose-response associations. Results: Among 30 565 participants (14 761 never smokers and 15 804 smokers; mean [SD] age, 57.1 [7.7] years; 15 693 [51.3%] female), 76 LC cases occurred during 139 011.51 person-years (crude incidence rate, 54.67 of 100 000 person-years). Smokers had higher LC risk than never smokers (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.49-5.01), driven by those with a smoking history of 20 pack-years or more (eg, ≥30 pack-years: AHR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.85-5.58). There was no elevated risk at 2 years (AHR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.91-4.69), but risk was significantly increased at 3 years (AHR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.19-5.41) and onward. A nonlinear dose-response association was found between pack-years and LC risk, with risk surpassing clinically relevant thresholds at approximately 20 pack-years (eg, 20 to <30 pack-years: AHR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.14-5.40). Females exhibited higher susceptibility than males at comparable exposure (≥30 pack-years: AHR, 5.78 [95% CI,1.87-17.83] for females vs 1.36 [95% CI, 0.18-10.39] for males). Significant risk was seen in those aged 50 to 54 years (≥30 pack-years) and 55 to 74 years (≥20 pack-years). Short-term cessation (<15 years) was not significantly associated with reduced LC risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, smokers with negative baseline LDCT findings exhibited a substantially elevated long-term LC risk, which became significant only after 2 years after screening. These findings suggest support for extending the initial screening interval and implementing personalized long-term monitoring based on smoking history.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsTobacco SmokingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41860552
PMCPMC13005165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.