Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860627›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Pediatric musculoskeletal ultrasound of the elbow: a pictorial review.

Hamza Alizai, Matthew Hammer, Jennifer Nicholas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hamza AlizaiDepartment of Radiology, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, TX, USA. Alizaih@chop.edu.
Matthew HammerUT Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jennifer NicholasCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. jennifer.nicholas@cchmc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elbow is a complex joint consisting of three separate articulations: ulnotrochlear, radiocapitellar, and proximal radioulnar. Collectively, these allow movements including flexion, extension, supination, and pronation. The developing pediatric elbow can be challenging to assess due to the predominance of cartilaginous epiphyseal and apophyseal structures, which are not evident on radiographs. Although MRI provides a comprehensive assessment of elbow anatomy, it can also be technically challenging. In a supine position with the arm to the side, the off-center position of the elbow can lead to decreased image quality due to magnetic field inhomogeneity with low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and poor fat suppression. Positions that attempt to bring the elbow to the MR iso-center can be uncomfortable in children suffering from elbow pain, leading to motion artifact. Furthermore, many of the soft tissue pathologies in the elbow are dynamic in nature and are best assessed using dynamic maneuvers. Ultrasound (US) is an ideal imaging modality for both static and dynamic assessment of the pediatric elbow joint and its soft tissue stabilizers. Additionally, comparison with the US of the contralateral elbow can serve as an internal control in the assessment of skeletally immature patients. In this narrative review, we describe the ultrasound technique for evaluating the pediatric elbow, the normal sonographic anatomy, and the common pathologies that may be encountered in practice.

Indexed as

Elbow JointJoint DiseasesUltrasonographyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePatient PositioningElbowMusculoskeletalPediatricUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41860627
PMCPMC13357443

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.