ArticlePloS one2026
DNA as a quantum system in evolution.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time may be viewed as an emergent consequence of increasing information entropy. I explore a toy quantum‑information model in which DNA is treated as an open quantum system. In this framework, weak, time‑dependent perturbations (potentially arising from thermal fluctuations, ionic microfields, metabolic noise, or electromagnetic signals) bias the micro‑timing of events during replication and repair. These slight timing shifts can influence the fate of transient electronic and protonic configurations (including short‑lived tautomeric states driven by proton‑transfer tunnelling), subtly altering mutation probabilities. To test this idea, I map nucleotides in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome to constrained qubit states and quantify informational structure using Shannon and von Neumann entropies and coding to non‑coding correlation metrics. Simulations of Hamiltonian dynamics under physiologically plausible perturbations show that real genomic segments exhibit distinctive dynamical signatures compared with controls. I also examine a variant in which a weak, slowly varying external signal is introduced as a background "beat" against which DNA dynamics can be compared. Because a Doppler shift in electromagnetic waves encodes the flow of time through the relative motion of source and observer, a cosmic microwave background (CMB) with a tiny frequency drift provides a conceptual clock and a source of informational entropy: it feeds a time‑correlated input into the DNA quantum system, allowing the molecule to sample cosmic time and translate it into a biological scale by modulating tunnelling probabilities and thus mutation patterns. This CMB‑inspired drive is simply a convenient illustration; the model does not rely on it, and other sources of weakly structured entropy could be tested. Across simulations, sequence‑dependent responses to both intrinsic and structured perturbations generate testable predictions: changing the structure or timing of these weak perturbations should produce reproducible shifts in mutation spectra. This framework connects cellular ageing and evolution to the flow of cosmic time and suggests experiments to probe DNA's sensitivity to time‑dependent perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.