ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Quantifying the fidelity of in vitro human cell culture systems using a biomedical foundation model.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Quantifying the fidelity of in vitro human cell culture systems using a biomedical foundation model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary cell culture is fast becoming a dominant method for discovery work regarding human disease. Currently, there are no methods to quantitatively benchmark these systems. Here, we apply a uniform in vitro culture system of human intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) to achieve this goal. We previously established methods for long-term two-dimensional (2D) cultivation of mouse IECs using an air-liquid interface (ALI) technique. Here, we further refined these methods for long-term 2D cultivation of human IECs, with histological and molecular features of differentiated intestinal epithelia. Leveraging the power and scalability of a biomedical foundation model (BMFM) trained on single-cell RNA sequencing data (BMFM-RNA), we performed classification tasks to identify cell types across sample sources and to quantitatively benchmark our in vitro differentiated cells against cells collected from patient biopsies. We observed a striking concordance between our in vitro differentiated cells and the corresponding cell types in vivo for multiple differentiated secretory cell types. This approach using BMFM-RNA holds promise to expand our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms, including gene-gene regulation underlying homeostasis and regeneration, as well as the functions of rare and poorly understood lineages within the human intestinal epithelia. Moreover, these methods may be applicable to other organs, model systems, and experimental modalities. We propose that the framework used here can be deployed as a standard benchmarking methodology, ultimately improving the fidelity of primary human culture systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.