ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Long-term outcomes of baseline grey-zone patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThe optimal management and outcomes of patients with HBeAg-negative grey-zone (GZe-) chronic HBV infection remain debatable. We assessed the outcomes and real-life management of GZe-patients and compared them to patients with typical HBeAg-negative chronic infection (CIe-).
methodsWe included all HBeAg-negative patients with baseline HBV DNA ≤20,000 IU/ml or HBV DNA >20,000 IU/ml and ALT <2x the upper limit of normal (ULN). Among patients without treatment indications in year 1, those with persistently normal ALT (≤ULN) and HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml were defined as typical CIe-, and all others were classified as GZe-. Outcomes included treatment initiation, HBsAg loss, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver-related events (LREs: HCC, decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplantation, or liver-related death).
resultsIn total, 1,501 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 4.6 years were included (GZe-/CIe-baseline characteristics: 811/690; GZe-/CIe-at year 1: 719/677). Compared with CIe-patients, GZe-patients more frequently developed treatment indications after year 1 (year 5: 13.4% vs. 2.2%; log-rank, p <0.001) and were more frequently treated after year 1 (year 5: 37.6% vs. 4.6%; log-rank, p <0.001). GZe-patients, particularly those with GZe-baseline characteristics, were less likely to achieve HBsAg loss (1-/5-year: 0.1/1.0% vs. 1/3%; log-rank, p = 0.012) and more frequently developed HCC (1-/5-year: 1/3% vs. 0%; log-rank, p <0.001) and LREs (1-/5-year: 1/4% vs. 0.1%; log-rank, p <0.001).
conclusionsGZe-patients represent a large proportion of patients with chronic HBV seen at tertiary centers and meet treatment indications more frequently than CIe-patients. They also have a lower probability of HBsAg loss and higher risks of HCC and LREs despite treatment initiation in most cases; therefore, their optimal management and timing of treatment initiation require further evaluation. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The outcomes of patients with grey-zone HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection remain uncertain, hindering their optimal management and timely treatment in clinical practice. Our real-world data from a tertiary HBV center provide valuable insights to guide the management of this patient group. Grey-zone HBeAg-negative patients represent a substantial proportion of the chronic HBV population and require careful monitoring, as they are at increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver-related events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.