Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2026
Effect of a clinical decision support system on stroke care quality and outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (GOLDEN BRIDGE II): cluster randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04524624 (A Multi-centre, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Integrated Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-centre, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Integrated Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The GOLDEN BRIDGE II Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Localized AI for stroke care in LMICs: a framework to overcome structural and diagnostic barriers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) on stroke care quality and clinical outcomes among patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
designMulticentre, cluster randomised clinical trial.
setting77 hospitals across China.
participants77 hospitals (38 randomised to intervention group, 39 to control group) enrolled 21 603 patients with acute ischaemic stroke admitted to hospital within seven days after symptom onset.
interventionsHospitals in the intervention group received stroke CDSS support including artificial intelligence assisted imaging analysis, classification of stroke causes, and evidence based treatment recommendations. Hospitals in the control group provided usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome was a new vascular event (composite of ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) within three months after initial symptom onset. Secondary outcomes included the composite measure and all-or-none measure of evidence based performance measures for acute ischaemic stroke care quality, a new vascular event at six and 12 months, and disability (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6) and all cause mortality at three, six, and 12 months. Safety outcomes were moderate or severe bleeding events and all bleeding events at three, six, and 12 months.
results11 054 patients in the intervention group and 10 549 patients in the control group were enrolled from January 2021 to June 2023. New vascular events at three months occurred in 2.9% (320/11 054) in the intervention group compared with 3.9% (416/10 549) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.93, P=0.01). The CDSS intervention effect remained significant in the cluster level analysis (-0.01, -0.02 to -0.004, P=0.003). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to have a higher composite measure (91.4% (77 049/84 276)
conclusionsUse of the stroke CDSS in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China led to a significant decrease in new vascular events at three months. The stroke CDSS intervention was also effective in improving stroke care quality and decreasing long term vascular events.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04524624.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.