Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862771›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2026

Gastrointestinal Complaints After Fundoplication: Rapid Review and Evidence Mapping.

Alberto Aiolfi, Davide Bona, Francesco Cammarata, Moustafa Elshafei, Cristina Ogliari, Carmelo Scarpignato, Luigi Bonavina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alberto AiolfiDivision of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, Milan, 20157, Italy. alberto.aiolfi86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-6075
Davide BonaDivision of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, Milan, 20157, Italy.
Francesco CammarataDivision of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, Milan, 20157, Italy.
Moustafa ElshafeiDepartment of General, Visceral and Tumor Surgery, St. Elisabethen Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany.
Cristina OgliariDivision of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, Milan, 20157, Italy.
Carmelo ScarpignatoDepartment of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, Msida, Malta.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-857X
Luigi BonavinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutrition Sciences, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza, University of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-1670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFundoplication is still the cornerstone of surgical intervention for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease unresponsive to medical management. While generally successful in resolving typical symptoms and improving patients’ quality of life, post-fundoplication symptoms unrelated to anatomical failure occur in a notable proportion of individuals. These complaints include persistent dysphagia, gas-bloat syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome, chest pain, and diarrhea. Advances in physiological research has contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis, prevention, and management of these postoperative symptoms.

findingsThis review synthesizes recent literature regarding gastrointestinal functional complaints following fundoplication, with emphasis on pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and evidence-based management strategies. Post-fundoplication complaints may be associated with incomplete preoperative work-up, untailored surgical procedure, defective surgical technique, or pre-existing disorders. Persistent dysphagia, gas-bloat syndrome, delayed gastric emptying, diarrhea, chest pain, and dumping syndrome are reported in up to 50%, 50%, 40%, 20%, 20%, and < 1% of patients, respectively. Various contributing factors have been identified, including defective esophageal motility and functional reserve, decrease of the fundic accommodation reflex, technical aspects of fundoplication and cruroplasty, iatrogenic injury to the vagus nerve, and exacerbation of pre-existing irritable bowel symptoms. Complete preoperative workup, patient’s education, and intraoperative EndoFLIP impedance planimetry have the potential to mitigate the incidence of persistent symptoms. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms offers promise for risk stratification and may enhance the prediction of postoperative functional outcomes. Functional gastrointestinal complaints are commonly encountered following fundoplication and can influence surgical outcomes, potentially impacting patients quality of life and overall satisfaction. A comprehensive knowledge of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms is essential for optimizing patient selection, refining surgical approaches, planning targeted management strategies, and enhancing long-term functional results.

Indexed as

FundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxGastrointestinal DiseasesPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsDeglutition DisordersDumping SyndromeHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDelayed gastric emptyingDiarrheaFundoplicationGas-bloatPersistent dysphagia

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.