Observational studyMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis Using Shear-Wave Elastography.
Observational study in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Donor-Site Morbidity Using Shear Wave Elastography After Peroneus Longus Autograft Harvest for ACL Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prolotherapy in patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and to objectively assess changes in tendon elasticity using shear-wave elastography (SWE). MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a prospective, single-center, observational clinical study. Thirty-six patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis were included. Each received 3 prolotherapy sessions at 3-week intervals. The elasticity and thickness of the common extensor tendon (CET) were evaluated using SWE both before and after treatment. Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The same orthopedic surgeon performed all prolotherapy injections, and the same radiologist performed all SWE evaluations. Data normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed variables were analyzed using the t-test or Paired Sample t-test, while the Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests were used for non-normal data. Correlations were evaluated using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Prolotherapy resulted in a significant increase in CET elasticity (kPa) and tendon thickness (P<0.01). Male patients exhibited greater tendon thickness and stiffness than female patients. Overall, SWE proved to be a reliable quantitative tool for tracking treatment response. CONCLUSIONS Prolotherapy is an effective treatment for lateral epicondylitis, contributing to pain reduction and structural improvement of the tendon. SWE offers a non-invasive, reliable imaging technique for objectively tracking changes in tendon elasticity. The combination of these methods provides valuable clinical and structural insights into the management of lateral epicondylitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.