ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2026
Temporal variation in markers of immune signaling and wound repair in primary human airway epithelial cells following acute versus repeated woodsmoke condensate exposure.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal variation in markers of immune signaling and wound repair in primary human airway epithelial cells following acute versus repeated woodsmoke condensate exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wildfire smoke (WFS) exposures are becoming more common, and firefighters and community members are often exposed to WFS for days to weeks. Controlled studies assessing the effects of repeated exposure to WFS and woodsmoke (WS; as a surrogate for WFS) or compared acute versus repeated exposure have evaluated a limited number of timepoints and endpoints using rodent models. Here, we leveraged differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) to test the hypothesis that different molecular responses occur upon acute versus repeat exposures to WS. HBECs (n = 4 donors) were exposed to 22 µg/cm2 red oak WS condensate for an acute, 4-h exposure, or repeat exposures of 4 h/d, 3 d/wk, across 2 wk. Membrane permeability, cell viability, and transcriptional responses were measured at the end of each exposure paradigm, and secreted proteins were measured throughout the repeat exposure. Acute exposure significantly increased expression of genes involved in fibrosis and immune response, whereas repeated exposure significantly decreased expression of genes involved in tissue repair and remodeling. Secreted protein responses were similar to transcriptomic responses and demonstrated temporal variation in response to exposure. This study supports the feasibility of using HBECs to evaluate acute and repeat WS exposures and indicates differential responses from these exposures with direct relevance to pulmonary disease processes, including those involved in fibrosis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These findings highlight the need for future studies to better understand molecular responses to repeated smoke exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.