ArticleDiscover oncology2026
A multicenter retrospective study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservation rate in locally advanced breast cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe burden of locally advanced breast cancer is increasing in low-middle income countries (LMIC) with major impact on the women’s quality of life (QOL). We aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the rate of conversion of breast surgery from mastectomy to conservation. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study on files of patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer (clinical stage IIB to IIIC) in 2 academic hospitals between January 2016 and December 2020 who are eligible for neoadjuvant therapy as per tumor size and\or lymph node involvement. The study was approved by the IRB and all patients signed informed consent form.
resultsA total of 103 consecutive patients were eligible with a mean age of 48 years and 26.2% of them younger than 40 years. The majority (87.4%) presented with clinical stage III, 45% were luminal A-like subtype. After neoadjuvant therapy, 100 patients had surgery, among which 47 patients (47%) could attain breast conservation and 35% achieved pathological complete remission (PCR). Breast conservation could be more commonly achieved in patients < 40 years (p = 0.05), those with lower clinical stage (p < 0.001) and those with higher KI67 (p = 0.017). PCR was more common in high KI67 (p = 0.016), and HER2-positive tumors (p = 0.003). After a relatively short follow-up, the3-year DFS rate for all study group was 65.9% with a superior 3 year DFS rate in patients who had BCS (78% vs. 56.3% in MRM group); p = 0.04.
conclusionEven in limited resources setting, neoadjuvant therapy has a valuable role in downstaging and breast conservation highlighting its importance as a cornerstone management in high risk non metastatic breast cancer patients. QOL could be an advantage though it was not directly assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.