ReviewThe Journal of frailty & aging2026
Insights on geroscience pre-clinical and clinical trials to promote healthy aging from the Intrinsic Capacity, Frailty and Sarcopenia Research Task Force 2025.
Review in The Journal of frailty & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How human and animal frailty index studies can inform each other: a brief narrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Review
- Natural products targeting cytokine-regulated SASP inflammation networks in Ovarian cancer: Implications on immune escape and molecular resistance.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal and Edible Plants for Anti-Aging: A Systematic Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Delivery Systems, and Clinical Evidence.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Intrinsic Capacity, Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR) Task Force convened in March 2025 to discuss geroscience-oriented pre-clinical and clinical trials aimed at promoting healthy aging. Key topics included the use of aging biomarkers in clinical trials, senotherapeutics, metabolism-targeting medications, and therapeutic strategies beyond pharmacological approaches. The discussions highlighted the growing interest in, and accumulating evidence for, geroscience interventions. Several future challenges were identified, including the need for a deeper understanding of the biology of aging and the validation of aging biomarkers against relevant clinical outcomes, such as frailty and intrinsic capacity. Furthermore, to accelerate innovation in the field, there is a need to enhance clinical trial methodologies and harmonization-for example, by defining a minimum common dataset of biological, physiological, and clinical factors for geroscience clinical studies-and to foster a paradigm shift, particularly among regulatory authorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.