Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41864346›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Interactive deep learning for myocardial scar segmentation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Aida Moafi, Danial Moafi, Simran Shergill, Evgeny M Mirkes, David Adlam, Nilesh J Samani, Gerry P McCann, Mostafa Mehdipour Ghazi, J Ranjit Arnold

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aida MoafiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Danial MoafiDepartment of Information Engineering and Mathematics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Simran ShergillDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Evgeny M MirkesDepartment of Mathematics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
David AdlamDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK; Centre for Digital Health and Precision Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK; Centre for Digital Health and Precision Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Gerry P McCannDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK; Centre for Digital Health and Precision Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Mostafa Mehdipour GhaziPioneer Centre for AI, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Ranjit ArnoldDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: jra14@leicester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing myocardial infarction, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a reliable metric for risk stratification and therapeutic planning. However, conventional segmentation methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, with high inter-observer variability and inconsistent performance in routine clinical practice. This study sought to develop an interactive deep learning system for scar segmentation and quantification.

methodsThe framework was developed and evaluated using LGE-CMR images from 348 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (244 training, 51 validation, and 53 test). The model incorporates prompt-guided segmentation and leverages a vision foundation model adapted for medical imaging, integrated into a clinician-facing interface for real-time interaction, and automated quantification. Training used a composite loss function combining Dice overlap, voxel-wise cross-entropy, and Kullback-Leibler divergence against soft labels to address annotation uncertainty. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using expert manual annotations as the reference standard, with assessment of segmentation accuracy, repeatability, and agreement with the conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM).

resultsThe framework achieved expert-level segmentation performance on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.74 ± 0.10; Hausdorff distance = 5.87 ± 6.79 mm) with a median scar mass error of 1.28 g (interquartile range [IQR] 0.74-2.34), corresponding to 1.4% (IQR 0.81-2.47) of left ventricular mass. Repeatability analysis (n = 41) demonstrated excellent agreement, with both inter- and intra-observer concordance correlation coefficients of 0.999 (compared with 0.737 and 0.952, respectively, for the conventional FWHM). Segmentation time was substantially reduced when using the interactive tool compared with the conventional workflow, averaging 65 ± 34 s per patient. Performance and repeatability remained high across the test set with differing levels of image quality.

conclusionThe proposed framework for scar segmentation with a human-in-the-loop design enables fast, accurate, and highly reproducible myocardial scar quantification from LGE-CMR. This may provide more consistent performance in routine clinical workflows.

Indexed as

CicatrixDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaClinical artificial intelligenceDeep learningFoundation modelHuman-in-the-loopMyocardial infarctionScar segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41864346
PMCPMC13241718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.