ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Experiences of hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: a patient journey map based on a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study employed a patient journey mapping approach to identify the multidimensional needs of individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) throughout the course of hemodialysis (HD) treatment, to inform and optimize care delivery across the entire treatment trajectory.
methodsQualitative studies examining patients’ experiences with HD were identified through systematic searches of six domestic and international databases. Patient experiences were extracted and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Sixteen patients receiving HD at our hospital were recruited between 1 September 2025 and 30 October 2025 to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis to complement and enrich the findings from the literature. Patient journey maps were developed by integrating evidence from both the literature review and the interview data.
resultsA total of 28 studies were included in the analysis, from which four core themes comprising 14 subthemes were synthesized. Three key phases of the HD journey were identified: the diagnostic screening period, the adaptation and adjustment period, and the long-term maintenance period, which form the preliminary framework for the patient journey map. To further refine this framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted, which clarified themes related to patients’ tasks (17), emotions (8), and pain points (8). These insights informed the finalization of a comprehensive patient journey map.
conclusionNursing needs among patients undergoing HD are dynamic and evolve across different stages of treatment. The patient journey map developed in this study provides a theoretical foundation for delivering timely and efficient medical and social support throughout the health management process. Moreover, this study offers practical guidance for optimizing nursing care for patients receiving hemodialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.