ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Clinical efficacy of plasma cell-free DNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing bloodstream infections.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOur initial goal was to assess the clinical efficacy of using plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to perform metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect suspected infections.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 425 patients who underwent plasma cfDNA mNGS. Of them, 84 patients had various systemic infections, 69 were ruled out of infectious diseases, and 272 had bloodstream infections. Conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) and plasma cfDNA mNGS were conducted concurrently in clinical practice. The sensitivity and specificity of the two techniques were examined based on the final diagnosis.
resultsThe total positive rate (276/425) for the cfDNA mNGS test indicated the presence of microorganisms. The mean length of stay in the hospital for mNGS-positive patients was longer than for mNGS-negative patients (P = 0.0079). Compared with patients with negative mNGS tests, those with positive mNGS tests have significantly lower white blood cell counts in peripheral blood (P = 0.0085). Among all the disorders in our patients, bloodstream infection (272/425, 64.0%) accounted for the most significant percentage. The diagnostic sensitivity of mNGS is also higher than that of CMTs (72.8% vs. 32.9%). However, its diagnostic specificity is lower than CMT’s (75.4% vs. 85.5%). Bacteria were the most frequently identified potential pathogens by mNGS. Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 46) was the most common pathogen. Candida albicans is the most common fungal infection (n = 18). Human cytomegalovirus (n = 45) is the most common viral infection. The detection rate of mNGS in empirically treated groups was significantly higher than in non-empirically treated groups(71.9% vs. 51.4%, p < 0.0001), which is contrary to conventional microbiological tests(21.7% vs. 41.0%, p < 0.0001). Of the 276 patients with positive mNGS results, clinical management was positively affected in 122 (44.2%) cases. Negative mNGS results led to a modified clinical management regimen in 121 patients. The average hospitalized days for the day 1–3 sampling time were significantly shorter than for the other two groups(sampling time 4–7 days and sampling time ≥ 8 days).
conclusionsOur research found that mNGS has higher positive predictive values (PPVs) than CMTs. Plasma cfDNA mNGS can be used in addition to CMTs to help doctors provide effective anti-infection treatment and reduce hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.