ReviewBiomarker research2026
Multi-omics biomarkers in female fertility: from oocyte quality to endometrial receptivity and clinical translation.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput omics technologies have transformed our understanding of female reproductive biology, revealing molecular interactions governing oocyte maturation, ovarian reserve, endometrial receptivity, and embryo development, yet most findings remain fragmented and insufficiently translated into clinical practice. This review synthesizes multi-omics biomarker discoveries across the reproductive continuum, organizing evidence around three clinically accessible compartments: the follicular unit (follicular fluid, granulosa/cumulus cells), the endometrium (endometrial tissue, uterine fluid), and the embryo (spent culture media). For each compartment, we first characterize single-layer signatures: transcriptomic markers of oocyte developmental competence, metabolic profiles reflecting follicular health, immune and decidualization programs defining endometrial receptivity, and embryo secretomic footprints. We then examine how integrative analytical frameworks and computational modeling enhance prediction accuracy beyond individual modalities, enable mechanistic patient stratification, and reveal coordination failures invisible to single-omics approaches. Critical evaluation of receptivity testing illustrates that distinguishing timing misalignment from intrinsic endometrial dysfunction requires multi-layer endotyping beyond transcriptomics alone, while embryo selection benefits from combining metabolic efficiency readouts with morphokinetic parameters and stress response signatures. The review addresses translational challenges including workflow constraints, lack of standardization, limited external validation, and cost-effectiveness issues, positioning multi-omics biomarkers within clinically defensible scenarios, such as recurrent implantation failure with euploid embryos and embryo selection under discordant morphological signals, where integration may add actionable value. Future directions include precision-guided treatment strategies, proactive fertility monitoring, and AI-driven decision support, with multi-omics biomarkers representing the molecular foundation for transforming reproductive medicine from reactive infertility treatment to proactive fertility management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.