Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41865217›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Towards a sweetpotato genomic-enabled breeding: optimizing two-stage analysis of multi-environment augmented trials.

Saulo Chaves, Reuben Ssali, José Tiago B Chagas, Kaio Olimpio G Dias, Bert De Boeck, Thiago Mendes, Hannele Lindqvist-Kreuze, Hugo Campos, G Craig Yencho, Guilherme da Silva Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Saulo ChavesDepartment of Agronomy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Reuben SsaliInternational Potato Center (CIP), Kampala, Uganda.
José Tiago B ChagasDepartment of Agronomy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Kaio Olimpio G DiasDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Bert De BoeckInternational Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru.
Thiago MendesInternational Potato Center (CIP), Nairobi, Kenya.
Hannele Lindqvist-KreuzeInternational Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru.
Hugo CamposInternational Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru.
G Craig YenchoDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Guilherme da Silva PereiraDepartment of Agronomy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil. g.pereira@ufv.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-8630

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-041105Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-002971Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers CGIAR Trust Fund contributorsCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 00x0ma614Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ 02529-22Gates Foundation INV-002971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageUsing the full weight matrix and deregressed pedigree-based best linear unbiased predictions in second-stage models lead to selections and genomic predictions closer to those obtained using a single-stage model. In multi-environment genomic selection, although single-stage (SS) models are generally more efficient (no loss of information), there are contexts where they are difficult to fit, making two-stage models the most practical alternative. An example is the evaluation of early-stage observational trials (OTs) of sweetpotato breeding, where several clones are tested in unreplicated trials. In this study, 1,138 clones derived from partial diallels within two gene pools had their storage root yield evaluated across six OTs. Using this scenario, we compared the selection and prediction performances of models under different two-stage strategies against the SS benchmark. We also tested whether pool-specific genomic prediction models offered advantages over models trained with the complete dataset. Given the lack of replication in OTs, we hypothesized that deregressed best linear unbiased predictions (dBLUPs) or pedigree-based dBLUPs (dABLUPs) would work more appropriately as inputs for second-stage models than best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs). These comparisons were conducted within weighted models using either a diagonal weight matrix or the full weight matrix. For selection, differences among second-stage models were minor, with a slight advantage for those using dABLUPs as entries, combined with the full weight matrix. For prediction, however, the choice of weighting scheme had a greater impact on performance than the choice of entry. Using the complete dataset, differences between entries were marginal, but for pool-specific predictions, dABLUPs provided the best performance. Overall, if adopting a two-stage strategy for the analysis of augmented trials, we recommend using dABLUPs together with the full weight matrix.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenome, PlantGenomicsIpomoea batatasModels, GeneticPlant BreedingGenotypePhenotypeSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID41865217
PMCPMC13005861

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.