ArticleDrug safety2026
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Following Idarucizumab and Andexanet Alfa: Assessment of a Signal of Disproportionate Reporting From the Food and Drugs Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.
Article in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacovigilance assessment of gout: a real-world study using the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdarucizumab and andexanet alfa are licensed for the emergency reversal of the antithrombotic effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Given their recent commercialization and rare use in clinical practice, current evidence on rare thromboembolic adverse events following idarucizumab or andexanet alfa administration is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to perform a signal detection analysis based on data from a large spontaneous reporting database to identify possible safety signals concerning rare, serious and unexpected thromboembolic events reported following the administration of idarucizumab and andexanet alfa, respectively.
methodsA disproportionality analysis was performed based on Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) submitted from any US or non-US country between 2004 and 2022 to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). A case/non-case approach was applied: cases were ICSRs containing the event of interest, non-cases were the remaining reports. The odds of exposure to idarucizumab and andexanet alfa, respectively, in cases versus non-cases was measured. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for 434 Preferred Terms from three relevant sub-standardized MedDRA
resultsA total of 11,561,146 ICSRs submitted to FAERS between 2004 and 2022 were analysed. Idarucizumab and andexanet alfa were listed as suspected drugs in 1463 and 399 reports, respectively. A total of 21 SDRs for idarucizumab and 19 for andexanet alfa were obtained. Eleven ICSRs containing the drug-event pair idarucizumab-disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (ROR 14.5; 95% CI 8.0-26.3) and four containing andexanet-alfa-DIC (ROR 19.4; 95% CI 7.2-51.9) were selected for case-by-case assessment. Two additional andexanet-alfa-DIC ICSRs submitted in 2023 were identified using the FAERS Public Dashboard, although one was a duplicate. Nine of the 11 for idarucizumab and four of the five for andexanet alfa were original ICSRs with a case narrative available. Age was reported in ten idarucizumab cases (mean 79 years) and four andexanet alfa cases (mean 71 years). Nine idarucizumab cases and four andexanet alfa cases were fatal. Causality was judged 'possible' for five idarucizumab cases and three andexanet alfa cases which occurred within 1 day from administration. The remaining ICSRs were classified as 'unlikely' or 'conditional/unclassifiable'.
conclusionsThe disproportionality analysis of the FAERS allowed us to highlight the associations between idarucizumab-DIC and andexanet-alfa-DIC, which might otherwise have remained unobserved due to the rarity of DIC and the low utilization of idarucizumab and andexanet alfa. Although the case-by-case evaluation was limited by the intrinsic indication bias, a causal link remained possible in those cases that occurred soon after administration. Since DIC is a life-threatening and often fatal condition, further investigation is warranted while close follow-up of high-risk patients may be considered to promptly detect any sign of coagulopathy following the administration of DOAC reversal agents. Any such observed adverse events should be reported to the relevant pharmacovigilance system in a timely manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.