ArticleScientific reports2026
Abdominal obesity in India: sex stratified multilevel estimates across 707 districts from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal obesity, measured using the waist-to-hip ratio, is an emerging public health concern in India, yet national averages mask important subnational variation relevant for local policy and prevention planning. We sought to quantify district-level variation in abdominal obesity and to examine its individual- and contextual-level determinants across India. Using nationally representative data from the National Family Health Survey 2019–2021, we analysed 664,646 women aged 15–49 years and 96,010 men aged 15–54 years across 707 districts and 30,112 communities using multilevel logistic regression. Abdominal obesity was defined using WHO-anthropometric cut-offs for WHR (women: >0.85; men: >0.90). National prevalence was high, affecting 56.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.41–56.74) of women and 48.9% (95% CI: 48.31–49.46) of men, with higher levels among older adults, wealthier groups, and urban residents. Marked inter-district heterogeneity was observed, with clusters of high prevalence in northern and eastern India and distinct sex-specific spatial patterns. Variance partitioning indicated that individual-level factors accounted for about 67% of total variation among women and 70% among men, while community-, district-, and state-level factors together explained the remaining variation. These findings demonstrate the value of small-area estimates for identifying high-burden populations and informing geographically targeted public health planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.