ReviewStem cell research & therapy2026
A review of the circadian regulation of stem cells: harnessing the internal body clock for enhanced regenerative therapies.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCircadian rhythms are endogenous, transcription-translation feedback loops that align cellular activities with the 24-h light-dark cycle. Stem-cell populations across tissues exhibit circadian oscillations that influence their self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation. Key developmental pathways (Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, and Hedgehog) are increasingly recognized as both regulators and targets of circadian machinery.
objectivesThis review synthesizes current knowledge on the bidirectional crosstalk between circadian clock components and major stem-cell regulatory pathways, and evaluates how this interplay shapes tissue homeostasis, regenerative capacity, and therapeutic potential.
methodsLiterature examining molecular interfaces between circadian clock genes and Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog signaling was surveyed, with emphasis on transcriptional regulation, chromatin dynamics, post-translational control, and functional outcomes for stem-cell behavior and regeneration.
resultsEvidence indicates that core clock components modulate stem-cell pathways through direct transcriptional control, shared enhancer architecture, altered chromatin accessibility, and rhythmic protein modification. In turn, Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog signals feed back onto clock genes, influencing circadian amplitude and phase within stem-cell niches. Perturbation of this reciprocal regulation disrupts tissue maintenance, diminishes regenerative responses, alters metabolic equilibrium, and may promote tumorigenesis.
conclusionsCircadian oscillators act as temporal gatekeepers of stem-cell function. Mapping the molecular interfaces between clock genes and developmental signaling pathways reveals new opportunities to refine regenerative therapies. Chronotherapeutic strategies, i.e. timing interventions to intrinsic circadian phases may enhance the efficacy, precision, and safety of stem-cell-based treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.