ArticleKorean circulation journal2026
Strain-Volume Loop Dynamics: A Novel Perspective on Left Ventricular Dysfunction.
Article in Korean circulation journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesStrain-volume loop (SVL) dynamics demonstrate the relationship between myocardial strain and left ventricular (LV) volume throughout the cardiac cycle, offering insights into both systolic and diastolic function. This study aimed to identify SVL characteristics that differentiate heart failure (HF) patients from those without cardiac disease.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 352 individuals who underwent 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography at tertiary care hospitals. Participants were classified into no cardiac disease, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) groups. Temporal 3D strain and LV volume data from each frame were used to construct SVLs. Key parameters-systolic, early and late diastolic slopes, area between curves, and peak strain-were analyzed.
resultsPatients with HFpEF exhibited lower systolic slopes compared to those without cardiac disease, while patients with HFrEF had the lowest values (p<0.001). During early diastole, individuals without cardiac disease exhibited a sharp strain change relative to volume, whereas the HFpEF and HFrEF groups showed diminished changes. Differences in early and late diastolic slopes and the area between the systolic and diastolic curves progressively decreased from individuals without cardiac disease to those with HFpEF and HFrEF. Support vector machine analysis using SVL parameters showed strong discrimination, with 0.878 overall accuracy in classifying the 3 groups.
conclusionsSVL analysis comprehensively represents the strain-volume relationship, distinguishing HF patients from those without cardiac disease. It may serve as a non-invasive tool for evaluating cardiac function, providing insights into functional transitions across HF phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.