ReviewJSAMS plus2024
Adherence to exercise in breast cancer survivors during and after active treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in JSAMS plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which Exercise Prescriptions Improve Physical Fitness in Patients with Breast Cancer Before, During, and Following Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Pooled it
- Persistent differences in aerobic physical activity guideline adherence among U.S. cancer survivors: Evidence from the national health interview survey, 2010-2020.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Response to Comment on "Effects of Exercise on Cytokine Profiles in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Exploring Long-Term Exercise and Fitness Maintenance Using Group Versus Individual Training in a Diverse Group of Breast Cancer Survivors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ensuring adherence to exercise programs is important for optimizing benefits and efficacy of interventions in women with breast cancer. Despite numerous studies on adherence to exercise in women with breast cancer, no systematic review has exclusively examined exercise adherence and its influencers during and after active treatment in this population. This review aims to examine the adherence rates and influencing factors for exercise in breast cancer survivors during and after treatment. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. We included studies on adherence to exercise and potential influencing factors conducted on women with breast cancer. Relevant studies were screened, and data were extracted. Analyses of adherence and factors influencing adherence were performed for 'during' and 'after' primary cancer treatment. Systematic review and meta-analyses were performed. Results: Twenty-six studies were included. The overall pooled exercise adherence was 64% (95% CI: 58%-70%). Adherence to exercise during primary cancer treatment was 63% (95% CI: 55%-70%), and after primary cancer treatment was 68% (95% CI: 59%-78%), with no significant variation (Q = 0.82, p = 0.36). Physical fitness, baseline physical activity, fatigue, education, body mass index, and having a partner were identified to influence adherence during primary cancer treatments. Body mass index was reported to have a negative association with exercise adherence during and after primary cancer treatment. Conclusions: The review revealed no significant variations in exercise adherence among women with breast cancer both during and after primary cancer treatments. Body mass index appeared to be negatively associated with both stages of primary cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.