ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
A digital twin framework for predicting and simulating type 2 diabetes onset using retrospective lifestyle data.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Narrative Review of Digital Twins in the Health Domain: Development, Application, and Evidence Consolidation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a rising global health concern, heavily influenced by modifiable lifestyle and psychosocial factors. However, most predictive tools focus on biomedical markers and rely on real-time data from wearables or electronic health records, limiting their scalability in resource-constrained settings. This study presents a novel digital twin (DT) framework that uses retrospective lifestyle, behavioral, and psychosocial data to forecast T2DM onset and simulate the estimated effects of preventive interventions. Methods: Data were drawn from 19,774 participants in the UK Biobank cohort, followed for up to 17 years. A penalized Cox proportional hazards model was employed to estimate individual time-to-event risk trajectories based on 90 candidate predictors. Predictors were selected through univariate screening, multicollinearity assessment, and variance filtering, yielding a final model with 14 significant variables. Causal inference techniques, including directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and counterfactual simulations, were used to explore intervention effects on disease progression. Results: The model demonstrated strong predictive performance (C-index Conclusion: This study introduces a transparent, simulation-enabled DT framework for estimating T2DM risk and exploring behavioral intervention scenarios without reliance on real-time data streams. It enables interpretable, personalized prevention planning and supports exploration of scalable deployment in public health, particularly in underserved or low-infrastructure environments. The integration of psychosocial and lifestyle data represents an important step toward more equitable and behaviorally informed digital health solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.