ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Evaluation of nutritional interventions and their impact on metabolic syndrome risk markers in older adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is extremely common in the elderly and strongly increases the chances of cardiovascular disease, diabetes with a type 2, and functional impairment. Although the positive effects of certain dietary interventions have been proved by controlled trials, little evidence has been provided concerning the usefulness of nutritional strategies in the ordinary clinical settings among the elderly population. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the effects of documented nutritional intervention on the metabolic syndrome risk markers in older adults based on real-world clinical data. Methods: The retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of 1,300 adults aged ≥ 60 years with MetS, who received treatment in January 2019-December 2024 in tertiary hospitals and their affiliated outpatient clinics, was conducted. Exposures to nutrition were Mediterranean-style diets, DASH-type diets, low-carbohydrate and high-fiber counseling, calorie limited diets, Omega-3 and vitamin D, and combined interventions. The alterations in the anthropometric parameters, glycemic parameters, lipid parameters, blood pressure parameters, inflammatory/oxidative stress parameters, nutritional intake and MetS status were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to establish predictors of MetS improvement. Results: The findings were significant in all the MetS components. Body weight (-2.9 kg), waist circumference (-3.8 cm), visceral fat index (-1.3), fasting glucose (-7.9 mg/dL), HbA1c level (-0.3%), HOMA-IR (-0.7), triglycerides (-24.9 mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (-11.8 mg/dL), systolic blood pressure (-7.7mmH). There was a significant increase in diet quality scores and also the increase in fiber, omega-3, vitamin D, potassium, and magnesium dietary consumption and decrease in sodium, dietary consumption. All in all, 41.4% of the respondents had partial or total MetS resolution. Dietary style of Mediterranean origin, fiber consumption ≥ 25 g/day, ≥ 5% weight loss, omega-3 supplementation, vitamin D deficiency, low sodium consumption, and exercise alone forecasted MetS improvement. Conclusion: Nutritional interventions are linked to significant changes in metabolic, inflammatory, and cardiovascular risk factors in older adults with MetS in their routine clinical practice. These observations favor the position of real-life dietary interventions as good measures to counteract MetS and enhance healthier aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.