ArticleGlobal heart2026
Gender Differences in Major Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Mexican Adults.
Article in Global heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When Risk is Unequal: Gendered Pathways to Cardiovascular Disease.Global heart · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Unhealthy lifestyle habits, including high-calorie diets and physical inactivity, increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and kidney disease frequently precede cardiovascular events. This study aimed to characterize the sociodemographic and clinical profiles of individuals who have experienced such events and to provide updated evidence on the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the Mexican adult population. Methods: Data were obtained from adults aged ≥ 20 years with chronic diseases who participated in the 2018 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Biomarkers were measured from fasting (8 h) blood samples. The survey used a cross-sectional, probabilistic design with national representativeness. The prevalence of major cardiovascular risk factors was estimated by sex and CVD diagnosis. Logistic regression analyses yielded adjusted odds ratios, identifying significant associations between key risk factors and CVD. Results: Women exhibited a greater prevalence of obesity (38.6%), diabetes (17.4%), dyslipidemia (88.5%), and a personal history of myocardial infarction (19.5%) in comparison to men; similarly, women and individuals aged 50-59 years demonstrate the presence of more than two concurrent risk factors. The prevalence of obesity, dyslipidemia and hypertension in women was associated with an increased likelihood of a CVD diagnosis, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.6[95% CI: 1.5, 4.5]. Conclusion: The prevalence of cardiovascular events was similar between sexes; however, different risk factor profiles were identified. The pharmacological treatment alone has not been sufficient to achieve therapeutic goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.