ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2026
Meta-analysis of the association between marital status and hypertension: evaluating the impact of age and gender.
Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and is more prevalent in the elderly. Due to the aging population, it is crucial to know the risk factors of hypertension to prevent it and its complications. One potential risk factor is marital status; therefore, this study investigates the impact of marital status on hypertension risk, considering the variables of gender and age.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar until August 27, 2023. Study selection and data extraction were performed precisely. The pooled effect size for various marital status, age, and gender subgroups was calculated.
resultsThe overall effect size of the association between marital status and HTN was 32.01 (95% CI = [38.93, 35.09]). Single, married, divorced, and widowed subgroups showed an effect size of 17.67 (95% CI = [19.23, 19.12]), 54.89 (45.05, 64,13]), 16.11 (95% CI = [14.00, 18.23]), and 27.46 (95% CI = [23.63, 31.29]), respectively. The analysis based on age revealed an effect size of 0.52 (95% CI = [0.38, 0.65]) and 0.38 (95% CI = [0.24, 0.52]). For those aged above 40 and below 40, respectively. Finally, males and females were associated with HTN, with effect sizes of 0.38 (95% CI = [0.33, 0.43]) and 0.45 (95% CI = [0.39, 0.51]), respectively.
conclusionOur findings revealed that married and divorced status is associated with the highest and the lowest incidence of hypertension, respectively. In terms of gender and age, males aged < 40 were related to lower hypertension risk compared to females and those aged ≥ 40. However, more extensive cohort studies are needed to further support our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.