ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Early biomarkers for predicting sepsis-induced shock: insights from inflammatory pathways and immune response.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monocyte-Containing Inflammatory Indices Show Stronger Association with 30-Day Mortality than the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Elderly Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic determinants of metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation and machine learning prediction of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe sepsis-induced shock is one of the most challenging problems in critical care despite the progress made in treatment. Recognizing high-risk patients early on is critical for successful results, and the standard diagnostic approaches to such an ailment fail to identify it prior to shock setting in. Biomarkers have become promising diagnostic, prognostic predictors and treatment surveillance platforms in sepsis in the past few years. This review discusses the significance of biomarkers, e.g., cytokines, chemokines, acute-phase proteins and immune dysfunction markers in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced shock. Additionally, we investigate the potential of new biomarkers, including microRNAs, circular RNAs, endothelial biomarkers, gene signatures, a combination of multimarker panels and machine learning models to improve the diagnostic and prognostic proficiency. As effective as they may seem, they (biomarkers) create challenges in clinical application, including variability, standardization, cost and regulatory approval. This review discusses future approaches to sepsis biomarker research, focusing on personalized medicine, global availability, and clinical validation to address barriers currently experienced in improving sepsis management worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.