Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868191›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Effect of reminder phone calls in the language of origin on colorectal cancer screening participation among immigrants in Norway: a randomised controlled trial.

Nadia Iqbal, Sameer Bhargava, Solveig Hofvind, Khadra Samia Farah, Øyvind Holme, Edoardo Botteri, Paula Berstad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06324409 (Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Immigrants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06324409 nacompletednot on this map

Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Immigrants

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian Institute of Public HealthRan2024 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsCancer ColorectalArmsReminder telephone call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadia IqbalCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Sameer BhargavaCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig HofvindCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Khadra Samia FarahCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Øyvind HolmeCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Edoardo BotteriCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Paula BerstadCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effect of providing oral information in immigrants' language of origin on screening participation remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effect of a reminder phone call in the language of origin combined with a reminder letter in Norwegian, compared to only a reminder letter in Norwegian, on participation in ColorectalScreen Norway among immigrants from Pakistan and Somalia. Methods: We conducted a randomised controlled trial among individuals born in Pakistan or Somalia (age 55-56) who did not return a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) within six weeks after the kit was mailed. Individuals were randomised (1:1), to receive a reminder letter in Norwegian and a phone call in their language of origin (intervention) or solely the reminder letter (control). The primary outcome was participation in ColorectalScreen Norway, defined as return of the kit within 12 weeks after sending the reminder letter. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06324409. Findings: We included 416 individuals (215 men and 201 women) during the period from March to October 2024: 217 in the intervention group and 199 in the control group. Overall participation was 24% (53/217) in the intervention group and 11% (22/199) in the control group (risk ratio 2·21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1·40-3·49)). Participation among Pakistani immigrants was 30% (30/101) in the intervention group and 12% (12/101) in the control group (risk ratio 2·50 (95% CI 1·36-4·60)), and among Somali immigrants 20% (23/116) and 10% (10/98), respectively (risk ratio 1·94 (95% CI 0·97-3·88)) (p Interpretation: Reminder phone calls in the individuals' language of origin doubled the participation rate among immigrants from Pakistan and Somalia in ColorectalScreen Norway, with consistent effects across both nationality groups. The results highlight the complexity and diversity of ensuring access to cancer screening for all and demonstrate the potential of oral information to reach immigrants. Funding: The Norwegian Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancer screeningHealth equityImmigrantsLanguage of originOral informationRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41868191
PMCPMC13000538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.