SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Transradial versus transfemoral access in uterine artery embolization for fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Uterine fibroids-Minimally invasive treatment with embolization].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Transradial access in interventional gynecology and obstetrics: Current evidence, clinical applications, and future directions.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a well-established, minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Traditionally performed through transfemoral access (TFA), there has been growing interest in the transradial approach (TRA) due to its reported benefits in other interventional procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare TRA and TFA in UAE for uterine fibroids. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted from their date of inception to April 2025. Data were synthesized and analyzed using Review Manager. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS and RoB 2 tools. Results: Six studies ( Conclusion: TRA is a safe and effective alternative to TFA for UAE in selected settings, providing reduced radiation exposure, shorter procedure times, faster recovery, and fewer access-site complications. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251027231, CRD420251027231.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.