Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868335›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Beyond fossil plastics: next-generation PLA-based bio-packaging for industrial applications - advances, challenges, and data-driven insights.

Naja Hasoon K T, Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishna Panicker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naja Hasoon K TDepartment of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology Calicut Kerala India unnig@nitc.ac.in naja_p220235cy@nitc.ac.in.
Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishna PanickerDepartment of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology Calicut Kerala India unnig@nitc.ac.in naja_p220235cy@nitc.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6257-7217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of conventional plastics has increased the need for sustainable alternatives, particularly those derived from renewable resources. Among these, polylactic acid (PLA)-based industrial materials have emerged as prominent candidates for replacing conventional plastics in various applications. PLA, a biodegradable and compostable polymer synthesized from renewable resources, such as cornstarch and sugarcane, offers several advantages, including environmental friendliness and lower greenhouse gas emissions. This review examines the current state of PLA-based bio-packaging materials, focusing on their features, production processes, and performance in comparison to traditional plastics. This review discusses advancements in PLA technology, including routes for enhancing its mechanical strength, thermal stability, and barrier properties, which are critical for its application in various packaging scenarios. Additionally, this review addresses the challenges associated with PLA, including its limited availability, higher cost compared to conventional plastics, and issues related to its end-of-life disposal and recycling.

Identifiers

PMID41868335
PMCPMC13001162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.