ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Serum proteomics reveals biomarkers for diagnosis, stratification, and mechanistic insights into cerebral microbleeds.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are small vascular lesions detectable on MRI and are associated with increased stroke risk and cognitive decline. However, imaging-based diagnosis is limited by cost and accessibility. This study aimed to identify serum protein biomarkers for early CMB diagnosis and to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying CMB subtypes. Methods: We enrolled 43 patients with MRI confirmed CMBs and 38 healthy controls. Serum proteomic profiling used high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Differential protein expression and pathway enrichment analyses were performed. Biomarkers were selected using LASSO, support vector machine recursive feature elimination, and random forest algorithms. Validation employed enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ( Results: We identified 151 proteins that differed between CMB and control groups. Altered pathways involved inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and lipid metabolism. Five proteins emerged as candidate biomarkers: MMP3, EFEMP1, TIMP1, UMOD, and UBA52. MMP3, EFEMP1, TIMP1, and UMOD showed robust validation performance with AUC values > 0.7, and EFEMP1 positively correlated with CMB burden. Subtype analysis distinguished lobar from deep CMBs, with RCN1, NEO1, and APLP1 effectively discriminating subtypes with AUC values > 0.8. Pathway analysis highlighted MAPK, RAF, and ERK signaling in deep CMBs and IGF signaling in lobar CMBs. Interpretation: This study presents the first comprehensive serum proteomic landscape of CMBs and identifies novel biomarkers with potential for noninvasive early diagnosis and subtype differentiation, supporting precision medicine approaches for CMB management. IGF and MAPK pathway signatures suggest mechanistic links between CMB subtypes and neurovascular aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.