ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Analysis of discrepancies in hemorrhagic transformation and infarct volume in ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: After endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke (IS), clinical observations have shown that some patients with small infarct volumes develop hemorrhagic transformation (HT), while some patients with large infarct volumes do not. This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to these differences and to assess the impact of HT on neurological outcomes. Methods: A total of 732 patients were divided into small infarct volume (0-15 mL) and large infarct volume (≥70 mL) groups. The incidence of HT, risk factors, neurological outcomes (NIHSS changes), early neurological deterioration (END), and 7- and 90-day mortality rates were compared. Results: In patients with small infarcts, higher systolic blood pressure, lower triglyceride levels, the number of EVTs, and other factors were related to an increased risk of HT. By contrast, in those with large infarcts, where HT occurred more frequently and was more severe, it was associated with more severe neurological deficits before treatment, elevated albumin levels, and the number of EVTs. PH2 hemorrhage was linked to more severe neurological deficits, higher END rates, and increased short- and long-term mortality, particularly in large infarcts. Conclusion: Infarct volume is closely related to the occurrence and severity of HT. HT in small infarcts is influenced by hemodynamic and metabolic factors, while in large infarcts, it is linked to extensive brain tissue damage. PH2 hemorrhage is the most adverse prognostic subtype, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and intervention in patients with large infarcts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.