ArticleDiscover social science and health2026
Perspectives and lived experiences of postpartum women seeking health services from traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in Mayuge District, Eastern Uganda.
Article in Discover social science and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Village-level surveillance of neonatal disease with integrated real-time dashboards and quality-control in Uganda.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A narrative qualitative study of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and patient referral practices among Traditional Birth Attendants in East Central Uganda.Discover public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Uganda, despite ongoing efforts to promote skilled birth attendance, many women in rural communities continue to deliver with Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs). Understanding the reasons behind this preference and the nature of care provided by TBAs is critical for informing maternal health policy and community-level interventions. Objective: To explore the experiences, perceptions, and underlying factors influencing the continued use of TBAs for childbirth among postpartum women in Mayuge District, Eastern Uganda. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in Mayuge District. In-depth interviews were held with 12 postpartum women who had delivered with TBAs within the past six months. Participants were purposively selected to capture variation in age, parity, and location. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English. Thematic analysis was conducted using both inductive and deductive coding in NVivo 13. Results: Five overarching themes emerged: (1) Health System Barriers, including poor access to health facilities, transport challenges, and mistreatment by health workers; (2) Perceived Benefits of TBA Care, such as affordability, emotional support, privacy, and flexible payment options; (3) Traditional Practices and Beliefs, with participants emphasizing cultural alignment, spiritual care, and birth rituals provided by TBAs; (4) Health Risks and Limits of TBA Care, reflecting awareness of complications, delayed referrals, and lack of emergency support; and (5) Community Influence, where social norms, peer recommendations, and collective trust in TBAs shaped decision-making. A cross-cutting theme of husband and family involvement also significantly influenced birth location choices. Conclusion: The continued reliance on TBAs is shaped by a complex interplay of structural barriers, cultural values, perceived advantages, and community dynamics. Interventions to improve maternal health in rural Uganda should address health system gaps, promote respectful and culturally sensitive facility-based care, and engage families and communities in birth preparedness efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.