ArticleCytotechnology2026
Study on the effect of Ursolic acid on liver cancer cells using z-vad-fmk and ROS inhibitors.
Article in Cytotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effect of Ursolic acid (UA) on liver cancer cells through cell experiments, in order to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis.
methodBy adding z-vad-fmk apoptosis inhibitor and ROS inhibitor NAC, CCK8, cell apoptosis, Western blot experiments, mitochondrial membrane potential detection, and ROS flow cytometry were conducted. Compared with the positive drug sorafenib, the inhibitory effect of UA on liver cancer cells and its promotion of apoptosis were studied. The results of CCK8 confirmed that when UA was at its optimal concentration, its inhibitory effect on liver cancer cell viability was greater than that of sorafenib; Through cell apoptosis experiments, it can be observed that under fluorescence microscopy, the fluorescence intensity in the UA+HepG2 group is significantly stronger than that in the sorafenib+HepG2 group; Western blot experiments showed that the relative expression levels of proteins in HepG2 were almost equal between the HepG2+UA and sorafenib+HepG2 groups; through ROS experiments, it was found that when the reactive oxygen species in the HepG2+UA group were lower than those in the sorafenib+HepG2 group, it indicated that the former had a stronger effect of UA on HepG2.
conclusionUA has a significant inhibitory effect on proliferation and promotes apoptosis in liver cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.