ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Exploring the Presenting Problems and Services Received by Youth with Diverse Mental Health Presentations in Integrated Youth Mental Health Services Across Canada.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated youth mental health (YMH) primary care initiatives have the potential to improve Canada's treatment gap. However, there is no current standard for implementing these services, and offerings vary greatly across models and sites. This has equity implications for the care received by youth with severe presentations. Methods: We describe the provider-rated problems with which 2995 youth presented to ACCESS Open Minds, a multi-site, Canadian YMH integrated care initiative and the services they received, based on the severity of their needs at intake. Results: The largest proportion of youth had both moderate-severe presentations and moderate-to-significant difficulties in functioning (41.67%). The first instance of receiving services following intake for most participants (71.42%) entailed a single service. The highest proportion of youth for whom the type of service received was not documented was those who presented with neither moderate-severe presentations nor poor functioning (15.01%). There was substantial variability in services provided across sites. Conclusion: Variability in service delivery confirms the need for greater standardization of core service offerings across sites. Future research should assess the appropriateness of services for different presentations to ensure equitable support is provided for all youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.