ArticleCureus2026
Barriers to Conducting Medical Research in a Newly Established Private Medical College: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Medical research in emerging academic settings is an essential and rewarding endeavor that drives advancement in newly established universities within the medical education community. However, numerous barriers may impede the progress of academic medical research, particularly in developing academic environments. Identifying and understanding these barriers is critical to formulating effective strategies to overcome them. Objective This study aims to identify barriers to research faced by faculty members and instructors at a newly established private medical college in Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in early 2024 among approximately 120 full-time faculty members and instructors at the Alfaisal College of Medicine. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire developed by the study investigators and distributed via Google Forms. A census-based sampling approach was employed. The survey was pilot-tested with three faculty members to assess clarity and feasibility. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline and outcome variables. Data management and analysis were conducted using Jamovi software (version 1.2.27 for Windows). Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained before study initiation. Results A total of 38 faculty members and instructors responded (response rate: 32%), 63% of whom were female. Most respondents (92%) reported publishing at least one paper per year, and 79% felt encouraged by college leadership to conduct research. The most commonly reported barriers included limited funding, shortages of skilled staff, restricted access to patient populations, insufficient protected research time, challenges with IRB approval, and limited mentorship. Suggested strategies to strengthen the research culture included expanding research incentives, increasing technical support, and recruiting full-time researchers and research assistants. Conclusions This study identified key barriers to research at a newly established private medical college in Saudi Arabia. Despite relatively high research activity, productivity is constrained by limited funding, staffing shortages, and restricted access to research support and patient populations. Addressing these gaps through strengthened funding mechanisms, enhanced research infrastructure, expanded incentives, and dedicated research support personnel is essential for fostering a sustainable and productive research culture. Prioritizing protected research time should also be a permanent institutional goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.