Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869261›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparison of Adverse Events Associated With Six Common Antibiotics in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Toru Ogura, Chihiro Shiraishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toru OguraClinical Research Support Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, JPN.
Chihiro ShiraishiDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a major global health concern, contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality. Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for these infections, but their safety profiles may vary across drug classes and patient populations. Understanding patterns of reported adverse events (AEs) among patients with LRTIs could provide useful insights for pharmacovigilance. Objectives To explore and compare the safety profiles of six antibiotics frequently used for bacterial LRTIs using data from a spontaneous reporting database. Methods Data were obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify AEs associated with these antibiotics in cases referring to LRTIs. Given the limitations of spontaneous reporting systems (e.g., underreporting, reporting bias, absence of denominators), this study was designed as hypothesis-generating. Time to AE onset was determined by the interval between antibiotic initiation and AE occurrence for cases with complete date information. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and adjusted RORs (aRORs) were calculated to compare reporting proportions among antibiotics, with each antibiotic sequentially used as the reference in pairwise comparisons. Adjusted analyses accounted for sex, age, and reporter country, and Bonferroni correction adjusted the significance threshold to 0.0033. Results Across 11,522 patients, a total of 664 serious AEs were identified. Ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest reporting proportion, with 89 of 809 patients (11.0%), followed by clarithromycin (129/1,572; 8.2%), azithromycin (132/2,048; 6.4%), amoxicillin (90/1,796; 5.0%), levofloxacin (198/4,604; 4.3%), and doxycycline (26/693; 3.8%). Ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin were associated with a higher frequency of serious AEs compared with amoxicillin. For non‑serious AEs, dermatological disorders were reported less frequently with azithromycin, doxycycline, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin than with amoxicillin, whereas neurological disorders were more frequently reported for doxycycline, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Dermatological and lung disorders tended to appear early, typically within the first day after treatment initiation, whereas liver and renal disorders developed later (median ≥ 2 days). No single antibiotic exhibited consistently lower reporting proportions across all AE categories. Conclusions This FAERS‑based analysis identified antibiotic‑specific differences in both overall and serious AE reporting among commonly used agents for LRTIs. Fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) and macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin) showed elevated serious AE reporting relative to amoxicillin, underscoring the need for careful benefit-risk assessment. These drug‑specific patterns and temporal characteristics may help inform targeted clinical monitoring and guide future pharmacoepidemiological research to verify these hypothesis‑generating findings.

Indexed as

antibiotic selectionclinical decision-makingdatabasepharmacovigilancesafety profile

Identifiers

PMID41869261
PMCPMC13003162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.