ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
A novel angiotensin(1-7) agonist, PNA5, reduces ischemic reperfusion injury and cardiac dysfunction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ischemic heart disease, typically caused by myocardial infarction (MI), is the leading cause of death. Ischemic reperfusion (IR) injury following MI is multifaceted, driven by reactive oxidative species (ROS), calcium overload, and inflammatory responses. Because our novel glycopeptide derivative of Angiotensin-(1-7), PNA5, has an improved half-life, decreases circulating inflammatory cytokines, and inhibits endothelial ROS production, we predict that PNA5 will attenuate IR sequelae post-IR. Methods: Three-month-old C57Bl/6J male mice were subjected to IR and treated subcutaneously, with PNA5 (100 µg/kg/day, Results: Conventional transthoracic echocardiography showed early improvement in ejection fraction by 5 weeks post-IR. Using speckle echocardiography, we demonstrated that PNA5 treatment improved the parameters of strain and dyssynchrony in regional and temporal domains. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left ventricular dyssynchrony showed continued dysfunction in untreated animals post-IR, whereas measures of ejection fraction did not. Along with reduced infarct size, PNA5 treatment improved cardiac remodeling, evidenced by reduced scarring within the midapical regions of the heart compared with untreated animals. Conclusion: These data suggest that PNA5 treatments improve heart outcomes post-IR and could potentially be a therapeutic for IR injury; measures of GLS and dyssynchrony may provide more relevant insight into the protective effects of PNA5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.