ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Application of Lean Methodologies in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Lean Methodologies in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We systematically reviewed whether lean management (LM) has improved efficiency and reduced waste in plastic surgery departments. LM is a set of principles first developed by Toyota in the 1950s to optimize efficiency and reduce waste in production systems. Methods: Four databases were searched from January 2008 to October 2023 to select studies using LM in plastic surgery departments. We included prospective, retrospective, and comparative studies in English. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes, we used the measures of effect as reported in the studies to compare findings. Results: A total of 2037 articles were identified, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3208 patients overall, with an average study length of 24 months. Most of the studies were prospective (n = 15, 79%) and conducted in the United States (n = 12, 63%). All studies showed improvement in their outcomes, including reduced time spent in theater (n = 6, 32%), cost savings (n = 5, 26%), reduced hospital length of stay (n = 5, 26%), and patient and staff satisfaction (n = 4, 21%). Morbidity and mortality remained unchanged in a majority of studies (n = 4, 21%). Conclusions: The need to improve our sustainability and patient flow is essential given worsening service pressures. LM provides an effective framework to optimize the efficiency of service provision and improve patient and staff satisfaction in plastic surgery departments. Larger studies are needed to understand the impact of greater efficiency on patient morbidity and mortality.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.