Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41869545›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Application of Lean Methodologies in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Poppy MacInnes, Samruddhi Tagalpallewar, Isabelle M Y Wood, Emma Foote, Kazuho Kawashima, Ali Esmaeili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Application of Lean Methodologies in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Poppy MacInnesFrom the Royal Free Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Samruddhi TagalpallewarFrom the Royal Free Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Isabelle M Y WoodFrom the Royal Free Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Emma FooteFrom the Royal Free Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Kazuho KawashimaFrom the Royal Free Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ali EsmaeiliFrom the Royal Free Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We systematically reviewed whether lean management (LM) has improved efficiency and reduced waste in plastic surgery departments. LM is a set of principles first developed by Toyota in the 1950s to optimize efficiency and reduce waste in production systems. Methods: Four databases were searched from January 2008 to October 2023 to select studies using LM in plastic surgery departments. We included prospective, retrospective, and comparative studies in English. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes, we used the measures of effect as reported in the studies to compare findings. Results: A total of 2037 articles were identified, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3208 patients overall, with an average study length of 24 months. Most of the studies were prospective (n = 15, 79%) and conducted in the United States (n = 12, 63%). All studies showed improvement in their outcomes, including reduced time spent in theater (n = 6, 32%), cost savings (n = 5, 26%), reduced hospital length of stay (n = 5, 26%), and patient and staff satisfaction (n = 4, 21%). Morbidity and mortality remained unchanged in a majority of studies (n = 4, 21%). Conclusions: The need to improve our sustainability and patient flow is essential given worsening service pressures. LM provides an effective framework to optimize the efficiency of service provision and improve patient and staff satisfaction in plastic surgery departments. Larger studies are needed to understand the impact of greater efficiency on patient morbidity and mortality.

Identifiers

PMID41869545
PMCPMC13004460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.