ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Development of the Social Housing of Ontario (SHO) Registry by health region: a platform for health research with the social housing population.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Social housing plays a critical role in addressing housing inequality and promoting well-being. This paper examines the creation of a registry of social housing sites across all six Ontario Health (OH) regions. Methods: For all 47 housing service providers in Ontario, social housing address, provider type, and building type were extracted from their website or from documents provided by the housing organization. The Registry included rent-geared-to-income housing with unique or minimally shared postal codes. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for the housing site characteristics aggregated by OH region. Results: 2,109 social housing sites were included in the final Registry, including 472 designated as seniors only (low-income naturally occurring retirement communities, LI-NORCs). There were regional differences in the proportions of each tenant designation, postal code uniqueness, housing provider types, and building classifications. For instance, the Toronto and North West regions had higher government-owned social housing sites (61% and 57%), whereas the East region had more non-profit owned sites (55%). Apartments were the most common building type across regions (57%), with varying proportions of townhouses and single/semi-detached houses. Discussion: A social housing registry, the SHO, has been established, serving as a valuable resource for health research, especially for marginalized populations. It can be linked to other datasets for future studies. The SHO Registry provides a robust method for the determination of LI-NORCs (low-income naturally occurring retirement communities).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.