ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Cryptogenic stroke in women: impact of insertable cardiac monitoring in the STROKEWISE cohort study.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07194811 (Stroke of Unknown Cause), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stroke of Unknown Cause: The Impact of Long-term Heart Monitoring on Stroke Recurrence in Women
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe clinical value of insertable cardiac monitoring (ICM) for detecting asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and guiding anticoagulation in patients with cryptogenic stroke remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between ICM-detected AF and recurrent stroke, mortality, and major bleeding in women. METHODS AND
resultsWe consecutively compared women with cryptogenic stroke who received an ICM at Akershus University Hospital (2016-23), with a control group from Haukeland University Hospital with standard non-invasive follow-up. Participants from both hospitals had complete data in the Norwegian Stroke Registry. Primary outcomes were AF detection and recurrent stroke at 1 and 2 years; secondary outcomes included mortality, composite stroke and mortality, ischaemic cardiovascular events, oral anticoagulation initiation, and major bleeding. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used for binary outcomes and Cox proportional hazards models for time-to-event outcomes, both adjusted for prespecified vascular risk factors. Among 475 women (mean age 73 ± 12 years; ICM n = 262), AF was detected in 36% in the ICM group vs. 9% in in the control group (OR 6.9, 95% CI 3.7-13.5; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in recurrent stroke (HR 1.8, 95% CI 0.78-4.36; P = 0.17), mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58-1.58; P = 0.88), or the composite outcome (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.6-1.5; P = 0.85) with a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR 15-66). However, fixed-time analyses showed significantly lower 2-year mortality with ICM (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.94; P = 0.036) and fewer bleeding events (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.52; P = 0.002). Age and troponin T were consistent independent predictors of adverse outcomes.
conclusionICM increased AF detection and enabled safe anticoagulation in women with acute cryptogenic stroke. Although stroke recurrence did not differ significantly, signals of lower mortality and major bleeding support prolonged monitoring to optimize secondary prevention. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT07194811, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07194811.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.