ReviewInternational journal of surgical pathology2026
Ampullary Amphicrine Carcinoma: A Rare Case Report With Review of Literature.
Review in International journal of surgical pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine differentiation is a common feature observed in epithelial tumors. Both exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation can be observed in tumors originating from the gastrointestinal system. However, since 1924, these tumors have been described under different names, leading to confusion among clinicians. While such tumorsare generally referred to as mixed adenocarcinoma-neuroendocrine carcinoma in the 4th WHO classification, amphicrine tumors are not currently included in any specific tumor classification. This study aimed to enhance the understanding of the clinicopathological features of amphicrine tumors, thus contributing to their standardized classification. A 52-year-old woman presented to our center with persistent nausea and vomiting. Physical examination revealed no findings except tenderness in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen. Intraoperative consultation revealed a tumor, approximately 8 mm in diameter, in the ampullary region. A tumor showing neuroendocrine differentiation was observed in the hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. After formalin fixation, tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation were observed in the sections. Trabecular and glandular patterns, and nuclear salt-and-pepper chromatin were observed in the tumor cells. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin. Alcian blue staining was positive for cytoplasmic mucin, and diffuse CDX2 expression was observed. As a result, the diagnosis was confirmed as "amphicrine carcinoma." Based on these findings, this type of tumor should be included as a separate histological type from adenocarcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm. This will also support a more standardized approach in terms of the treatment and follow-up protocols for patients with this rare tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.