ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
ANSWER-HF: sacubitril-valsartan reduces NT-proBNP in heart failure due to Chagas cardiomyopathy despite no reverse remodeling.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) is one of the leading causes of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Latin America, yet robust evidence for optimal medical therapy remains scarce. This mini-review examines the results, strengths and limitations of the ANSWER-HF study, a single-center, double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing sacubitril–valsartan with enalapril in 190 patients with CCC-HFrEF over six months. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary endpoints included N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides, echocardiography and functional parameters, clinical events and safety assessments. No significant differences were observed in LVEF, cardiac remodeling, 6-minute walk distance or clinical outcomes between study groups. However, patients randomized to sacubitril–valsartan achieved a significantly greater reduction in NT-proBNP at 6 months. These findings highlight the biological effect of sacubitril-valsartan in this population but reinforces the need for larger, long-term studies, powered to hard clinical endpoints, to further establish the role of sacubitril-valsartan in CCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870675What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.